EVE Search - Sticky:EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 Feedback

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 Feedback

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 39 post(s)
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 172	Posted - 2012.12.06 23:49:00 - [1] - Quote Give me back my damn jukebox! What the hell were you people thinking! Do you have ANY IDEA how MADDENING it is to listen to the same two tracks over and over and over when you spend any amount of time in game working on something????? Non Nobis Domine Non Nobis Sed Nomine Tua Da Na Glorium
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 172	Posted - 2012.12.07 00:09:00 - [2] - Quote Ehdward Spengler wrote: I understand that you may have liked the control inside the client and that was certainly handy but it was so crusty and keeping it up to scratch seems like a bit of a waste of development resources. http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/n572/the_grand_artificer/The-Most-Interesting-Man-in-the-Worldcopy.jpg As opposed, of course, to spending development time making us listen to the same thing over and over every time new content is added? The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 177	Posted - 2012.12.07 05:27:00 - [3] - Quote Oraac Ensor wrote: But not if you like to have login mu . . . oh, wtf, it's been said too many times already. Unfortunately there are those of us like myself who, if we try to run EvE and another audio program, they do not play nice at all. Basically my choices now boil down to play in silence or be driven nuts by the same music repeating over and over. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 178	Posted - 2012.12.07 14:20:00 - [4] - Quote Arabian Mistress wrote: Reverted? :p maybe if the thread gets 2000 pages they'll revert something. If that's all it takes, I'll post them myself if i have to to get Jukebox back. This is driving me CRAZY. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 178	Posted - 2012.12.07 18:51:00 - [5] - Quote Too bad we can't put bounties on devs. I'd love to drop a few billion on the bounty of whichever one of them thought that taking jukebox out was a good idea. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 179	Posted - 2012.12.07 23:22:00 - [6] - Quote CCP, please address the overwhelmingly negative response to the removal of jukebox. Or do we have to burn Jita again? The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 180	Posted - 2012.12.08 00:45:00 - [7] - Quote CCP Punkturis wrote: having bounties alone don't make anyone a legal target! You have played this game before, right? Since when has 'legal' or 'illegal' impacted suicide players? The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 182	Posted - 2012.12.08 09:45:00 - [8] - Quote Alaren Planeswalker wrote: CCP: .... Also, we removed your original car radios and installed new ones. you only get one station, and it plays the same song repeatedly THIS! ^ and I'd like to add 'and if your machine is old, will crash any other audio player you try to run.' Kaivaja wrote: And if you fly something expensive, the suicide gank risk is the same, bounty or no bounty. If you are a peaceful high sec'er, you really shouldn't be concerned if somebody places bounty on you. Unless you happen to fly freighters. At which point you better lube up. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 185	Posted - 2012.12.08 22:53:00 - [9] - Quote Syri Taneka wrote: Morrigan LeSante wrote: Edit: And full room aggro - seriously - fix that An unfortunate side effect of a) Sleeper AI (rats aren't dumb as posts anymore) and b) not refactoring npc numbers to account for this... That said! Myself and 2 alliance mates ran the Angel Military Operations site in RR BS' (Rattlesnake, Machariel, and Tempest) today with no problems. None of us got more than 25% shield damage, no drones died. Tried to do 'A Demonstration' with an Ishtar (Full Corpum A Type and Tech II) and a tengu. Both had to withdraw. Lost one Ogre II faster than I could pull it back to the drone bay. I have 11m sp in drones and lvl 5 in every single skill related to this ship, it's fitting, and those drones. So, to those that deny that drones get autopopped as soon as they appear, I can say that it's true, and my drones are a tad tougher than most. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 185	Posted - 2012.12.08 23:59:00 - [10] - Quote Chiro San wrote: I know its just a drake, but come on really, on a f**** radar site... It's severly **** up, it's true. Though not nearly as bad as some. I remember back in 2005 the missions right after patch were so absurd that a lvl 2 wiped a ten man fleet, 5 of which were battleships. Mind you, that wasn't deliberate like this, and we got our ships refunded, which you will never get now days, even if it you have an audio recording made by Helmar, in his office of the devs admitting they screwed up and your ships was one of those lost to the bug. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.

Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 189	Posted - 2012.12.09 17:22:00 - [11] - Quote Syri Taneka wrote: Okay, valid point. Too many EWAR NPCs for the new AI system. For now, spend a day or two putting levels in the proper racial sensor compensation skill for your mission boat, and we'll see what CCP does when they do it. Ok, so what do those of us who already have all of them at V do? Other than try to squeeze T2 sensors into our fits. Some of these mishs hit you with enough of them that they're actually past the point of diminishing returns. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 190	Posted - 2012.12.11 18:37:00 - [12] - Quote Hardwick Johnson wrote: 5) All the "get a buddy" comments. Sometimes we come to a game for the solitude and "tranquility" it provides, a means to get away from forced personal interaction while still doing something fun. (Another space game forced this on it's players about 2 years ago. it was a HUGE disaster that destroyed the player base and killed the game. Be careful forcing everyone to into the social mold.) I don't like getting on TS at 3am after a 10hr shift.... Please don't tell me I have to if I want to play this game, because that's ******. The really funny part is it barely matters. If you and your buddy are in the wrong boats, you're still just as ****. A pal of mine in a missile tengu and me in my Ishtar struggled to complete a lvl 4 with fittings that were nothing but deadspace and T2. This is despite our godly sp and long time experiance from being 2004 characters. I think it's time to start gathering people up and go blast the statue in Jita. Seriously, I could have designed a better expansion than this. The new destroyers are very nice, and the mining frig is useful, but everything else is horrible. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 192	Posted - 2012.12.11 20:32:00 - [13] - Quote Ribikoka wrote: [ Just a question, If the drake is not unbalanced why thats just the only one BC which can made the hardest lvl4 missions and the others is not ? Because unbalanced. Their tank is, ridiculous strong compared with others. 240hp/sec (2700HP/11.25sec) passive shield recharge ? LOL A BS with two large repairer can repair 1600HP/11.25 sec. You think about this its a normal thing ??? I dont think so. Actually, before current changes, it was easy to solo even the hardest lvl 4s with most BC. Drake was no where near alone in that. And, bluntly, my battleship passive shield tank fits easily did 3k in 11 secs. Large T2 reppers are a waste of space. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 193	Posted - 2012.12.11 23:30:00 - [14] - Quote Anyone taking bets that we'll see the Jukebox come back as something we can only unlock for plex? The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 198	Posted - 2012.12.12 01:55:00 - [15] - Quote Ribikoka wrote: I can wait because i want to see, how you lost your cap instantly when the blood HACS fly in to the mission. Or see when 6 frigate webbed you in the Enemies Abound. And yes i know how the eve mechanics working thats why i have almost 15k killmails with my all characters,and thats why i could finished with 6 blockade within 48 minutes with my two ship, but you dont think to me. Just wrote me and i will teach you with my 9 years experience how eve work. I see, you trying to save your mission ships, but the numbers of tank abilities not lying. smile I have 9 years experience, let me demo: Enemies Abound: Assuming you mean the 30km web frigs in part 4... I used pulse lasers or light drones prepatch (have not done since). In an ass frig, I just haul ass away from them and then deploy the Ishkur's light drones and rails. When you have mish with hacs, keep out of range, or use a cap injector in your fit. And if you took 48min to do six, I'm guessing a third ship was involved to loot, you just left the loot, or you did it in two ass frigs. Syri Taneka wrote: Nope. That's the one that took TQ offline for 3 days. That was the one with the massive active tank lag issues, IIRC> I wouldn't mind if they did that again as long as it worked when they brought it back. The funny part is that I hated how they screwed it up, but loved the content. Now we put patches out almost with relatively minor bugs, but I'm really hating the content. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 199	Posted - 2012.12.12 02:17:00 - [16] - Quote Ribikoka wrote: Let me demo your lame try. The light drones almost instantly popped from other ships in the pocket. And how about the sensor damps :P Good luck for your rail from long range when you are blind to 3km :D But was nice try. As I said, have not done since patch, but there are no damps in pocket 1, where those frigs are, last I was there. 2x Battleships(Navy Orion.) 5x Interceptors (Gallente Navy Delta II Support Frigate.) (Web) 3x Frigate (Gallente Navy Officer.) This is what is in pocket 1. The part of the mish that autoaggroed the drones was pocket 3 where you were only autoaggroed by 1x Battleships (Roden Shipyard Orion.) 2x Interceptor (Roden Shipyard Interceptor.) (Web) They're not hard to get away from. Once you get some ground, you can tear up the whole thing pretty effectively with ass frigs. Particularly since you just have to blast an object to win in the last area. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 199	Posted - 2012.12.12 02:26:00 - [17] - Quote Hakaru Ishiwara wrote: [Some of the best PvE drops (towers and modules) out there removed from the game with the Tyrannis expansion 2.5 years ago... Why? Originally because people were farming the **** out of them. However, I seem to recall that faction gear was looked at as a NeX item, if I remember my internal leaks correctly. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 201	Posted - 2012.12.12 03:17:00 - [18] - Quote Ribikoka wrote: First you need to fly and realize the real things there. I might say the same, but with better grammar. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 202	Posted - 2012.12.12 05:26:00 - [19] - Quote Well, it's in, the CSM;s response ot our complaints was basically 'STFU'. So, all of you with twitter, tweet to #csmsummit and maybe they'll hear us if we shout in thier ear. In particular, let's bring up the terrible QA and, do me a fave for the footwork, jukebox. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 202	Posted - 2012.12.12 12:23:00 - [20] - Quote Untouchable Heart wrote: Maybe better grammar, but you claim no real knowledge of Eve. No, I claimed it. I simply did not prove it o your satisfaction, apparently. But if you doubt my statements, you can always go watch lvl 4's being done in assault frigates on youtube. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.

Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 202	Posted - 2012.12.12 12:35:00 - [21] - Quote Ribikoka wrote: Where is your video when you did a lvl4 blood blockade with an AF ? Prove it or HTFU. And next you'll want When Worlds Collide and then so and so forth. (Which is, btw, the first time you named which Blood mission you were talking about, since there's more than one with cap drain) I'm not interested in going around and around with you on this, as it's getting OT. Anyone who can work google can find a dozen odd vids of the supposedly 'impossible' feat of doing lvl 4s in BCs other than drake and assault frigs posted around the internet. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 202	Posted - 2012.12.12 12:46:00 - [22] - Quote CCP Explorer wrote: One of the hardest decisions a developer has to make is to deprecate code and functionality, but once in a while such difficult decision need to be made. The problem is that it's in favor of a feature that most people will never know exists, and the majority of us that would notice, don't want. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 202	Posted - 2012.12.12 12:53:00 - [23] - Quote CCP Explorer wrote: ]Wow... "Threats"? I simply explained why the jukebox had been removed and linked a relevant devblog. I then expanded on that reply, mentioned a few tools and asked "(...) is investing time and people in that work worth it to you, the players? Will it increase the players' experience in general beyond other things we could be implementing and improving?" to try and understand what the benefit of those tools compared to other things is. No threats, just questions. Chill, my space bro. Well, let me pose this reply to your question: as most players do not use eve's audio at all (seriously, there have been a staggering number of 'eve has audio?' jokes at this point, you guys should take a hint) why are you punishing those of us that do by taking away our control of it? The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 203	Posted - 2012.12.12 13:17:00 - [24] - Quote CCP Explorer wrote: 82% of EVE players play with sound on and has increased from 80% since the release of Retribution. And since I've never heard of a survey for that, I'll have to ask where you got that information. Since we can all pluck numbers out of our ass. And how many of those, since you're so free with numbers, have music set to zero? DeBingJos wrote: PWND by CCP Explorer Hardly. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.
Cygnet Lythanea World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction 203	Posted - 2012.12.12 13:29:00 - [25] - Quote Hannott Thanos wrote: The logs. They actually show something. Heard of a logging system before? If they do, then they've been lying to us about the logs not showing anything at the client end for years and they owe me a lot of petitioned refunds. The Most Interesting Player In Eve.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.